Recent Updates Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Kate 10:33 on 2026-05-27 Permalink | Reply  

    Three men have been arrested and will be charged with murder in the first degree in connection with a fatal shooting at a St‑Léonard car wash in April 2022. As reported at the time.

     
    • Kate 09:18 on 2026-05-27 Permalink | Reply  

      Christopher Curtis looks into who raises money for Ensemble and his observations are a must‑read.

       
      • Taylor C. Noakes 11:15 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

        Excellent work, as always. Canada’s COI laws are a joke to begin with, but at the municipal level it’s evident they wouldn’t even matter.

      • Kate 12:53 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

        *conflict of interest

    • Kate 09:00 on 2026-05-27 Permalink | Reply  

      A woman pedestrian was hit by a car in Longue‑Pointe on May 20 and died two days later. It was only reported on Tuesday.

      Another fatal accident occurred in Mercier on Wednesday morning when two cars collided, leaving someone dead in one of the vehicles.

       
      • Kate 07:23 on 2026-05-27 Permalink | Reply  

        Steven Guilbeault is to announce that he will be leaving politics this summer, having parted ways ethically with the Carney government over plans to build a new oil pipeline.

        Guilbeault has been MP for Laurier–Sainte‑Marie since 2019.

         
        • Taylor C. Noakes 11:17 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

          I’ll always remember him as the heritage minister who decided it wasn’t a good idea to list the names of suspected Nazi war criminals and collaborators on Ottawa’s Victims of Communism monument, after Canadian Heritage decided to go ahead with the plan despite the historians they hired not having fully vetted the list.

      • Kate 07:14 on 2026-05-27 Permalink | Reply  

        As noted below in a comment by DeWolf, St‑Denis won’t be pedestrianized in the Quartier Latin as usual this summer, although there will be a couple of temporary street events. Some merchants are not happy, because they’ve benefited from the vibe of a strolling street.

        It won’t be pedestrianized next summer either.

         
        • Taylor C. Noakes 11:19 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

          There’s a fun twist: merchants unhappy because their streets aren’t being pedestrianized?

        • Meezly 11:59 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

          I’ll bet my left arm a number of merchants voted against Project Montreal, who played a key role in the summer pedestrianization of Quartier Latin. The city had partnered with the SDC Quartier Latin and local merchants to launch an economic recovery plan that included seasonal pedestrian-only zones. Hope they’re crying tears of regret.

      • Kate 20:28 on 2026-05-26 Permalink | Reply  

        CF Montreal had hopes of being able to play winter matches in the refurbished Olympic stadium, but when and whether this will ever be possible is still uncertain.

         
        • Joey 21:03 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

          On the one hand, the new MLS schedule means the CF needs an indoor stadium (way more winter games). On the other hand, Quebecers should be fully on the hook to enable the Saputos to have a leisure project.

        • Nicholas 00:08 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

          I’ve been on the pitch for soccer matches below freezing. Not too fun, but I wasn’t being paid what these guys are making. The Als can do it in November, the NFL does it in January, maybe they can handle a game or two in November (and, as they said, go on the road a bit). Baseball rains out, they can figure it out if we get a blizzard.

        • GC 03:47 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

          Did you mean “should NOT be”, Joey?

        • Kate 07:18 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

          I thought he was being satirical…

        • Joey 08:30 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

          LOL let’s say you’re both right

          Anyway, MLS is moving its calendar because, presumably, it will generate more profit for the league and its teams. So let them pick up at least part of the tab…

        • Josh Cuppage 11:44 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

          Nicholas: I think the concern is more for the fans than the players.

          Joey: MLS is moving its calendar to be in sync with the global soccer calendar. As it stands, MLS plays through several international breaks where all of the other significant leagues shut down to release players to their national teams. (A side effect of having run on a different calendar than all the other leagues for all these years is that it’s been a contributing factor to many elite players taking a pass on MLS.)

          And MLS is not going to pick up part of the tab here. They are an American-based league who just so happen to have a handful of Canadian teams in it. I think they’d be just as happy if Montreal and Vancouver were replaced with Detroit and Las Vegas. (It’s a problem generally for Canadian sport that our top level teams in most sports are mixed up with these American concerns.)

        • Joey 12:36 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

          Yeah, I understand the rationale behind the calendar change (which makes sense IMO), but it’s undeniable that MLS wouldn’t be making this move if it didn’t think it could make more money as a result – as you point out, they would trade off Mtl and Vancouver for US-based teams if they could make more money. But the way CF Mtl is positioning this is that the MLS is doing some altruistic schedule change to appease more important leagues and don’t-ya-know they just don’t have the money to support their franchises who are not set up for a winter season. Granted, it’s ridiculous to spend what $800M+ to renovate the stadium and *not* have it be able to host the local soccer franchise, but it can’t just be a permanent, recurring handout to the Saputos (net worth estimated at $7.59 billion by Maclean’s).

      • Kate 20:24 on 2026-05-26 Permalink  

        A pro-Palestine rally on the weekend is being investigated over mock hangings apparently of Donald Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli politician Itamar Ben-Gvir.

         
        • Kate 13:23 on 2026-05-26 Permalink | Reply  

          There are now 95 tents along the Notre‑Dame East park strip, a record number.

           
          • Kate 13:21 on 2026-05-26 Permalink | Reply  

            A recent report from the Observatoire Grand Montréal says the city population is in decline as the population ages and immigration is curtailed.

            More on this Tuesday: it’s not just that the population will shrink, but that it will also age, putting more of a burden on its younger, working‑age people.

             
            • Kate 10:02 on 2026-05-26 Permalink | Reply  

              Charles Milliard wants Quebec to emulate Doug Ford’s Ontario. Enough said?

               
              • Taylor C. Noakes 12:10 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                Charles Milliard: how else can I prove to you I have no idea what I’m doing right now?

              • Joey 12:43 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                Politics must be a lot harder than it looks given how often seemingly intelligent people wind up saying stuff like this…

              • Blork 16:06 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                Well, I only scanned the article but it seems like he’s mostly referring to things like making inter-provincial trade easier, standing up to Trump, and saying yes to Federal assistance in industry development. I’m not going to complain about those things.

              • Joey 17:14 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                Isn’t that the point? The hard part of doing politics is being able to say “we should borrow ideas and approaches from Doug Ford’s government” without everyone hearing “I want Quebec to emulate Doug Ford’s Ontario”… easier said than done…

              • Kate 19:53 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                Writing headlines – like writing brief blog summaries – lends itself to oversimplification.

              • Taylor C. Noakes 20:22 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                I dunno… ‘breaking down interprovincial trade barriers’ is a fancy way of saying ‘restricting workers’ rights’, and workers’ don’t have many rights to begin with, even here. It’s a euphemism for ‘get rid of anything standing in the way of the corporate steamroller.’

                Ford has taken a hatchet to Ontario’s environmental regulations, is a big fossil fuel booster, rejects EVs for purely ideological reasons, has zero respect for the press or for the rights of cities, and is pushing for nuclear power, despite far cheaper and more effective alternatives.

                He’s a rightwing populist, fundamentally no different than Danielle Smith, Scott Moe, or Pierre Poilievre. They are all cut from the same cloth, and they all will say and do whatever a small minority of elites tell them to, using language designed to appeal to everyone’s basest instincts.

                Do we need more of that in Quebec?

              • Blork 21:29 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                “‘breaking down interprovincial trade barriers’ is a fancy way of saying ‘restricting workers’ rights’, and workers’ don’t have many rights to begin with, even here. It’s a euphemism for ‘get rid of anything standing in the way of the corporate steamroller.’”

                Well, no, it’s more like “why was it so easy to sell goods to the U.S. but not right across the provincial border? Now that the U.S. is being the way they are it makes sense to do more trade horizontally.

                Most of those interprovincial trade barriers are based on things like the big domestic breweries needing to have a footprint in each province for union reasons, or to protect some agricultural producers, but that’s very 1950s thinking. It makes it difficult (for example) for a small independent brewery in Quebec to sell into Ontario or other provinces, or for Quebec cheese makers to sell to other provinces.

              • Blork 21:30 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                …it makes no sense that in Ontario you can find tons and tons of U.S. products, but so much stuff trying to come in from Quebec or BC has barriers on it.

              • Nicholas 23:50 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                I agree with Blork, including about how the headline is about emulating Ford but the article is about a speech to Toronto business people talking about how much he likes Ontario business. And while he could go into Ontario and say “I think the person I hope to be working with for 3 years sucks,” you can see why he might not do that.

              • Tim S. 08:00 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

                Every story about inter-provincial trade I’ve ever read features some craft brewer going on about how they can’t sell their beer in Alberta or whatever. If only we got rid of these silly laws, the economy could benefit by (X) billions of dollars.

                Now, I’m no economist, but I do enjoy the occasional micro-brew. There’s some from my last trip to Ontario in my fridge even now. Thing is, if it becomes legal to sell BC beer here or whatever, that’s nice, but not I’m going to drink much more of it. Whatever I buy from BC will replace what I now buy from Quebec. So, unless I and many others turn into a raging alcoholic (consuming only expensive niche products, mind you), I don’t see where these billions of dollars will come from.

                All of which is to say that, yeah, I agree with Taylor that I suspect inter-provincial trade barriers is code for “race to the bottom of worker, consumer and environmental protections.”

              • Blork 09:08 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

                The microbrewery example is always brought up because it’s easy to remember. It’s actually more about aligning various regulations and standards, etc. A bad (and fictional) example is something like this: Ontario insists that eggs be packaged by the tens while Quebec insists that eggs be packaged by the dozen. So Quebec farmers can’t sell eggs into Ontario unless they go through the expensive process of adding a “by the tens” packaging line. Obviously that’s made up, but my understanding is there are many real-life examples like that.

              • SMD 09:52 on 2026-05-27 Permalink

                From a report last year by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives:

                “The idea that there are vast, hidden interprovincial trade barriers holding back the Canadian economy has seized the political, media and public imagination. In reality, the alleged costs of interprovincial trade irritants have been vastly overstated, as virtually all goods, services and investment flows freely across provincial borders. In that sense, recent laws and executive decisions aimed at increasing internal trade should be seen as the “premiers’ new clothes.” […] While these efforts will have little effect on Canada’s internal economy, there are downsides to the public interest [as they] will further reduce governments’ capacity to protect the environment, spur domestic economies, promote workplace health and safety, and stop predatory behaviours against consumers.”

                Lots of good examples and analysis in the report.

            • Kate 15:46 on 2026-05-25 Permalink | Reply  

              The Permanent People’s Tribunal has opened a week‑long investigation here into missing Indigenous children and unmarked burials. But as noted in the Radio‑Canada deck, the tribunal’s rulings are not legally binding. A full ruling is expected at the end of September.

               
              • Kate 15:22 on 2026-05-25 Permalink | Reply  

                The city’s official list of pedestrianized streets for summer 2026.

                Here’s a version from CTV with a grille, but no map. Item from La Presse, but still no map.

                Isn’t St-Paul Street usually pedestrianized? But it never seems to be listed.

                Some media note that rue Villeray is a new one, but it’s only being pedestrianized as an alternative to de Castelnau, part of which had been closed to traffic for several summers but which needs to be dug up this year.

                 
                • Mozai 08:54 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                  Before I make one, I wonder if there’s a visual map of these locations.

                • Kate 09:12 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                  Looking, but haven’t seen one.

                • LJ 09:33 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                • Kate 10:04 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                  Was just about to post that, LJ. Thanks!

                • SMD 10:10 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                • CE 15:27 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                  St-Paul is already pedestrianized from Marché Bonsecours until St-Laurent and essentially becomes a shared street until McGill. You could also add place Jacques-Cartier which, for some inexplicable reason, is open to cars throughout the winter. I also noticed signs saying that Place d’Youville is going to be closed to cars over the summer.

                  Mont-Royal has been blocked off and they’re setting up. My favourite though is Duluth. Why the city allows cars on that street most of the year makes no sense to me!

                • CE 17:08 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                  I guess St-Denis in the Latin Quarter isn’t being pedestrianized this year?

                • DeWolf 17:28 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                  @CE — Sadly the Latin Quarter won’t be pedestrianized for the next two or three years due to the construction on Berri. The rationale is that St-Denis is needed for emergency access to the CHUM now that Berri is completely blocked. I think that also means the circus festival and other events held on the pedestrian strip will be displaced. The city gave the SDC a bunch of money this year so maybe there will be some interesting public terrasses or other installations.

                  These annual media reports never seem to include St-Paul, for some reason, even though the SMF administration cancelled plans to keep it pedestrianized year-round, so it’s definitely one of the summertime-only pedestrian streets.

                  There’s also Ste-Catherine in the Quartier des spectacles but thankfully that was permanently pedestrianized before SMF came into power. It had been “temporarily” pedestrianized year-round since 2020.

              • Kate 12:13 on 2026-05-25 Permalink | Reply  

                La Presse has a short photo essay around the 150th anniversary of Mount Royal Park.

                 
                • Kate 11:36 on 2026-05-25 Permalink | Reply  

                  Serge Audette was found guilty Monday of a murder committed 30 years ago, when he killed his neighbour Patricia Ferguson in Pointe‑aux‑Trembles.

                  Updating to add Daniel Renaud’s interview with Sabrina Ferguson.

                   
                  • Meezly 12:07 on 2026-05-25 Permalink

                    A great example of how effective and powerful good journalism/filmmaking can be. According to the article, the doc raised the question of how a violent sex offender was the last person to see Ferguson alive (and how the police didn’t look into him properly?). Ferguson also had an 11 mo girl at the time and her daughter always thought she had been abandoned. Now she knows the truth.

                  • Kate 12:19 on 2026-05-25 Permalink

                    Good point, Meezly. It must be so strange for her daughter, who wouldn’t even remember her mother yet could have been haunted by the thought she might have been abandoned. It is better to know.

                • Kate 11:33 on 2026-05-25 Permalink | Reply  

                  The Snowbirds are to do another flyover Monday evening around 18:15, before the Canadiens match at the Bell Centre.

                   
                  • MarcG 11:57 on 2026-05-25 Permalink

                    “Dear Ron MacLean. Dear Coach’s Corner. I’m writing in order for someone to explain to my niece the distinction between these mandatory pre-game group rites of submission and the rallies at Nuremburg. Specifically the function the ritual serves in conjunction with what everybody knows is in the end a kid’s game

                  • Tim S. 12:57 on 2026-05-25 Permalink

                    OK, MarcG, I’ll take this at face value. If I shouldn’t, forgive me.

                    You are, if I’m not mistaken, of the opinion that COVID was a social disaster, in that people didn’t/don’t care enough about each other to take basic precautions to mitigate harm. Might I therefore suggest, that events and rituals that bring people together, create joy in being part of something beyond oneself, could create bonds of empathy and lead to people caring more about each other?

                    Or is it better if we all bowl alone?

                  • MarcG 14:39 on 2026-05-25 Permalink

                    The song is a criticism of the military piggybacking on sports events, maybe I didn’t post enough of the lyrics.

                  • MarcG 15:37 on 2026-05-25 Permalink

                    Also brings to mind the interview with the guy who was burned badly at the Ferrari dealership linked below – he mentions how sparklers on his birthday cake reminded him of the incident and caused a sleepless night – imagine the effect war planes overhead has on some of us.

                  • Kevin 16:41 on 2026-05-25 Permalink

                    Ah well, disagreement is not treason.
                    But it’d be a different world if the orchestra I went to on Saturday, or the last Sugar Sammy show I saw, started with O Canada.

                  • jeather 18:17 on 2026-05-25 Permalink

                    Hey thanks for this it explains the very loud noise I just heard.

                  • MarcG 18:19 on 2026-05-25 Permalink

                    Maybe they fly the planes so that the steady stream of car and bank advertisements seem less violent. (Just heard them fly over)

                  • Joey 10:46 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                    I thought it was nice of the Snowbirds to do a flyover right after I retired the first batter while pitching in a softball game yesterday…

                  • Josh 11:17 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                    Flyovers for sporting events that are held indoors makes even less sense to me.

                  • CE 15:30 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                    Considering how much we as a society spend on high-tech military equipment, I enjoy getting to see it every once in a while.

                    I’m curious what bank and car advertisements can be considered “violent.” Unless you consider annoying and repetitive as a form of violence (I kind of like the very intense ones that the National Bank is running during the games on TVA).

                  • Kate 17:38 on 2026-05-26 Permalink

                    I play La Presse’s five-letter game, which involves watching a 15‑second commercial each time. Most are commercials for Honda, tightly edited. In some, there’s a few seconds of the car coming right at the camera. Every time, I flinch. Is that a violent image? As a pedestrian, I’m not sure I’d call it violent, exactly, but it’s jolting.

                c
                Compose new post
                j
                Next post/Next comment
                k
                Previous post/Previous comment
                r
                Reply
                e
                Edit
                o
                Show/Hide comments
                t
                Go to top
                l
                Go to login
                h
                Show/Hide help
                shift + esc
                Cancel